Tuesday, February 25, 2020

New Perspectives in Entrepreneurship - Avril Kennedy and Harlequin Essay

New Perspectives in Entrepreneurship - Avril Kennedy and Harlequin - Essay Example Mary Jesselyn Co (2006, p. 45-46) lists several characteristics of a successful entrepreneur, including a passion for business, internal locus of control, risk-taking, commitment, dedication, perseverance, a need for achievement, initiative, feedback/advice-seeking, creativity and innovation. Zeelie et al. (1998, p. 12) add, "In order to achieve entrepreneurial success, personal, internal development and the development of good interpersonal skills are essential." Steven Brandts (1996, ch. 4 p. 4) list includes applicable business or technical experience, verifiable integrity, the ability to communicate ideas, and a propensity towards team work. Evan Douglas (eds Carsrud & Braanback 2009, p. 19) wrote that "successful entrepreneurship is likely to provide societal benefits as well." Finally, Chris Steyaert and Daniel Hjorth (2004, p. 269) wrote that entrepreneurs emphasized the importance of alertness and timeliness. "Timeliness in taking action was critical because [the entrepreneur s] goal was to grab the (quickly) passing opportunity. Opportune times, they stressed, do not last long in fast-changing environments." Avril Kennedy had exhibited many of these characteristics from the time she started Harlequin. Applicable business and technical experience. Avril had experience selling as a demonstrator of products; therefore, she was exposed to a retail environment. She knew about the potential of making a profit at Barras because her ex-husband had rented a stall there in the past. Alertness and timeliness. As the business grew, Avril stayed abreast of news that would offer opportunities to expand the business, particularly with regards to the availability of more desirable real estate. Risk-taking. Co (2006, p. 46) noted that entrepreneurs "take calculated risks, not high or wild risks," and Avril built her business slowly and expanded purposefully. In an interview with Carmen Nobel (2011, n. p.), Tom Eisenmann, a professor in the Entrepreneurial Management Unit at Harvard Business School, said, "Lean startups don't try to scale up the business until they have product-market fit [PMF], a  magical event — more easily recognized in retrospect than in the moment — when they finally have a solution that matches the problem.  

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Pierce v. Society of Sisters Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Pierce v. Society of Sisters - Research Paper Example Is it poible for the state to demand that all children attent public school? In an undisputed decision, Supreme Court ruled on June 1, 1925 in contradiction of the State and in favor of parents in this case. According to the Court, this law violated Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment: ...the Act of 1922 irrationally affects the freedom of parents and guardians to direct the education of children and upbringing of their children under their control. As frequently heretofore pointed out, the rights guaranteed by Constitution might not be curtailed by legislation that has no sensible relation to some purpose within the capability of a state. Fundamental theory of liberty that all governments recognized by this union, repose rejects any overall power of state to regulate its children by compelling them to admit instruction from only public teachers. Surpeme Court did this, though, it specified that a State has authority to require children to join some school and power to control schools to see to it that they are doing a good job at their education. Following this way, it confirmed the interest government has in mingling the young to citizenship, but repudiates nevertheless that the State has a domination in this project. These poored cold water on some statesas they were worried about the impact of the â€Å"foreign† and immigrant’s values well-thought-out public schools as a source of help; therefore these states enlisted laws intentionally to use these schools in order to promote common American culture. And on November 7 in 1922, Oregon electorates passed an ingenuity that rewritten Oregon Law Section 5259, which was the Compulsory Education Act. This ingenuity was mainly eliminate parochial schools. Accordingly, it led to a severe loss of revenue for private schools like the Non-sectarian and the Hill military academia! In conjunction, parents began withdrawing their children away from these schools in the untruthful believe that these will soon end. These laws were mainly aimed at eradicating Catholics schools. The Compulsory Education Act, preceding amendments, had demanded that all Oregon children between the age of eight to sixteen years to attend the public school. This was wit h exceptions. 1. Those mentally retarded/ physically unable to attend school 2. Those who had just graduated from their eighth grade 3. Those living more than a quantified distance by road from a nearby school 4. Those children thare are undergoing home-schooling or those that are tutored 5. Those that are attending a state